www.mccannfiles.com

Home
Latest News
Maddie or Madeleine?
The McCanns' PDL Media Statements
The Eddie and Keela Searches/Videos
The Eddie and Keela Extended Videos
The Expresso Interview
Kate's Diary
The Huelva Trip
Sky News Crime Scene Picture Galleries
Case Files Released: UK Reports (1)
Case Files Released: UK Reports (2)
Case Files Released: UK Reports (3)
Case Files Released: Portuguese Reports (1)
Case Files Released: Portuguese Reports (2)
Case Files Released: The Sightings (1)
Case Files Released: The Sightings (2)
Case Files Released: Press Comments
The PJ's Final Report - 57 page summary
The PJ's Final Report - Ongoing Summary
The Smith Family Sighting, 03 May 2007
'A Verdade Da Mentira', 'The Truth of the Lie' (1)
'A Verdade Da Mentira', 'The Truth of the Lie' (2)
Gonçalo Amaral - The Interviews (July)
Gonçalo Amaral - The Interviews (Aug/Sep)
Correio da Manhã Exclusive Reports (July)
Correio da Manhã Reports (August)
Madeleine McCann
Gerry McCann
Gerry & Kate's Timeline
Kate McCann
Kate's Interviews
Robert Murat (2007)
Robert Murat (2008)
Murat Libel Settlement
03 May 2007
03/04 May Timeline
04 May 2007
05/06 May 2007
The First Reactions
Pat Perkins/The e-mail
Apartment 5A
Maps/Aerial Shots
The 'Last Photograph'
The 'Abductor'
The 'Eggman'
Cooper's 'Creepyman'
Cuddle Cat/Bear Hunt
Eddie and Keela
Charlotte Pennington
The Tapas Seven
Nannies/Childcare & Najoua Chekaya
Investigating Team
Gonçalo Amaral
Portuguese Penal Code
Método 3
Brian Kennedy
Madeleine 'Sightings'
The Tongeren 'Sighting'
'De Telegraaf' Letter
Alex Woolfall/John Hill
Mrs Pamela Fenn
Ray Wyre
Esther McVey
The Official Site
Madeleine's Fund
Mortgage Payments
The Movie
Vanity Fair Interview
Panorama Transcript
Various Transcripts
CNN Transcripts
O'Donnell/Smith
Misc Videos
Reports Pre-Arguido
Reports Post-Arguido (1)
Reports Post-Arguido (2)
Sol Reports
Misc. Comment 2007
Misc. Comment 2008 (1)
Misc. Comment 2008 (2)
European Campaign
LSE Event 30/01/2008
Express Group Apology
The Brussels Trip
The Strasbourg Trip
HELLO!
El Mundo Article
The Sun Review
Anniversary Interviews (TV)
Anniversary Articles (Media)
Anniversary Articles (Family/Friends)
Anniversary Articles (The Services)
Case To Be Archived? 01/02 July 2008
High Court Hearing 07 July 2008
Arguido Status Lifted - 21 July 2008
Madeleine Related 'Art'
CBS 48 Hours: 'Where's Maddie?'
BBC: 'The Mystery of Madeleine McCann'
Dispatches: 'Searching for Madeleine'
RTP: 'Anatomy of a Mystery'
Sky: 'The Mystery of Madeleine McCann'
MSNBC: 'Missing Madeleine'
ITV1 'Madeleine, One Year On' documentary
Al Jazeera: 'The McCanns v. The Media'
2007: May (1-28)
June (29-58)
July (59-89)
August (90-120)
September (121-150)
October (151-181)
November (182-211)
December (212-242)
2008: January (243-273)
February (274-302)
March (303-333)
April (334 - 363)
May (364-394)
June (395-424)
July (425-455)
August (456-486)
September (487-Date)
Gerry's Blogs (Days 1-58) May/Jun 2007
Gerry's Blogs (Days 59-120) Jul/Aug 2007
Gerry's Blogs (Days 121-181) Sep/Oct 2007
Gerry's Blogs (Days 182-242) Nov/Dec 2007
Gerry's Blogs (Days 243-302) Jan/Feb 2008
Gerry's Blogs (Days 303-363) Mar/Apr 2008
Gerry's Blogs (Days 364-424) May/Jun 2008
Gerry's Blogs (Days 425-486) Jul/Aug 2008
Gerry's Blogs (Days 487-Date) Sep/Oct 2008
Comment/Contact/Links

High Court Hearing 07 July 2008

Transcript of High Court hearing and related press reports. 

Clarence Mitchell and the McCanns team outside the High Court

The McCanns' spokesman Clarence Mitchell (centre) with the couple's legal team Ann Thomas (left) and Timothy Scott (right), outside the High Court

 
Address by Tim Scott Q.C. to the High Court of Justice on 07 July 2008
 
Address by Tim Scott Q.C. to the High Court of Justice on 07 July 2008, In open court: International Family Law Group
 
Representation
 
Madeleine McCann is a ward of Court. She had her 5th birthday on 12 May 2008.
 
Gerry and Kate are not here as they are on holiday with their twins, Sean and Amelie. Who could deserve a holiday more after a period more traumatic than any family should have to cope with.
 
(Mrs Justice Hogg intervened: 'I did not expect to see them.')
 
As the world knows, Madeleine was abducted from an apartment at a resort in Praia Da Luz in Portugal on 03 May 2007. No one has ever been arrested or charged in connection with her abduction. Her whereabouts are completely unknown. There is no proof that she is alive, but there is not a scrap of evidence that she is not.
 
After the abduction Gerry and Kate McCann set in motion their own search with professional assistance. A Fund was set up to finance the search and many people, often those who could barely afford it, have given generously to that fund.
 
Simultaneously a massive international police search was launched. Since the McCann family lives in Leicestershire, the Leicestershire Constabulary has been the lead force among UK law enforcement agencies. Gerry and Kate would like, through me, to acknowledge the enormous effort which has been devoted both by the Leicestershire Constabulary and by other law enforcement agencies to the search for Madeleine. They would also like to thank many individual officers for the kindness and concern which they have shown to the family throughout this terrible time.
 
Proceedings were started in this Court by a summons dated 17 May 2007. The sole purpose of the proceedings has been to call upon the extensive powers of the High Court to require assistance to be given in the search for a missing child. It is of course quite routine in the Family Division for such Orders to be made. For example in an appropriate case (though not this one) an Order can be made against a mobile phone company to produce the call record of a phone. It was never the parents' wish that the proceedings should become adversarial.
 
On 22 May 2007 an Order was made by you [4] in very wide terms requiring any person on whom the Order was served to disclose to the parents’ solicitors any information which might assist in identifying Madeleine’s whereabouts. The Order contained a clause entitling any person served with it to apply to discharge or vary it.
 
Among the bodies on whom the Order was served was the Leicestershire Constabulary, who immediately expressed doubts as to whether the Order was intended to or could properly extend to them. In due course the parents’ solicitors issued a further application seeking clarification of this. On 02 April 2008 you gave directions which were intended to lead to a hearing at which this question would be resolved. This is that hearing.
 
As the preparations for this hearing advanced, it became clear that the Leicestershire Constabulary and other law enforcement agencies, while personally sympathetic to the position of the McCann's objected on principle to the disclosure of at least the great bulk of the information in their possession. They raised a number of legal arguments relating among other matters to the public interest in maintaining the confidentiality of police investigations. Both the Serious Organised Crimes Agency and the Attorney-General intervened in the proceedings in order to advance their own arguments on issues of public policy.
 
It became clear that if today's hearing proceeded on a fully contested basis a number of areas of law of great interest to lawyers would have had to be considered. However Gerry and Kate McCann are not lawyers and so far as they were concerned the legal proceedings were moving further and further from the only matter which concerns them: the search for Madeleine. The proceedings were in danger of becoming a distraction from rather than an aid to that single goal.
 
Also there have been two recent developments which have greatly affected Gerry and Kate's views on these proceedings. The first is that the Leicestershire Constabulary has now agreed to release an important, though limited, part of the information which they have been seeking; I shall come back to that. The second is that, as has been widely publicised, it is expected that Gerry and Kate's status in Portugal as arguidos or suspects will be lifted soon. When that happens it is hoped and expected that a substantial further amount of information will be released.
 
Since Gerry and Kate have always wanted to work with all law enforcement agencies on a cooperative basis, they decided to withdraw the application against the Leicestershire Constabulary. We therefore come to Court today to ask you to approve an Order which all parties consent to.
 
The first part of the Order recites that the Chief Constable of Leicestershire has agreed to provide by today a document in accordance with Paragraph 50 of the Skeleton Argument which
has been presented to the Court on his behalf. That Paragraph is at 34. It says that the Chief Constable is currently preparing a document which will provide the parents with the contact details of persons that have been forwarded to the investigation by the parents or those acting for them. This document will also contain a brief resume of the information that it is believed the person informed the parents or those acting for them that they wished to pass on to the investigation.
 
I said earlier that this is an important but limited amount of the information which Gerry and Kate had hoped to obtain. I would like to explain why it is important. Although the Leicestershire Constabulary were quick to set up a major incident room and to provide a telephone number which anyone with information could call, there was a period of time before this became widely known.

During that time Gerry and Kate's solicitor, Ms Ann Thomas of The International Family Law Group, who sits in front of me, had already been retained. Her firm’s number was publicised and a large number of people called in.
 
All of these callers were given the number which the Leicestershire Constabulary had set up for the purpose. The solicitors thought it right that the police should be receiving it. In fact with few exceptions the solicitors did not even retain any notes on what the callers were saying or even their contact details.
 
So what the Chief Constable is now voluntarily providing is the contact details and a summary of the information provided by a substantial number of people who were among the first to try to help the investigation. It is because these were on the whole people who came forward to volunteer information in the period immediately after the abduction that it is likely that the information which they provided will be most helpful.
 
So on that basis Gerry and Kate McCann are content to withdraw their application for any wider disclosure. Paragraph 4 of the Order provides that the documents in the case shall remain confidential to the Court. This of course is completely normal in wardship. An exception is made
to enable the Chief Constable at his discretion to reveal the contents of his evidence and the legal arguments advanced on his behalf.
 
The parents understand that the points of principle which have arisen are of wider interest to law enforcement agencies, and they would not want to restrict proper discussion of those matters which might have a beneficial purpose in future investigations. They are confident that the Chief Constable will exercise his discretion in a responsible way.
 
The search for Madeleine continues. The fund which was established in May 2007 known as "Madeleine's Fund – Leaving No Stone Unturned" remains closely involved in the search. It always
has been and remains Gerry and Kate's purpose to leave no stone unturned. This was why they asked for the assistance of this Court in the first place, and this is why, in the light of developing circumstances, they now withdraw their application. We hope that you will accept, and will feel able to say that they have behaved completely properly and responsibly at every stage.
 
Tim Scott Q.C.
Phillippa Kaufmann
The International Family Law Group
For Gerry and Kate McCann
 
The following two transcripts are from an eye-witness account of the proceedings by 'emma2', sections confirmed in various press reports:
 
Mr James Lewis QC, for the Chief Constable of Leicestershire:
 
We would like you to approve the Order. As the Court heard, any person served with the Order should disclose any information that would help to find Madeleine. We wish to make it clear that the primary aim is to ensure that no stone is left unturned.
 
There must be a balance between the rights of Plaintiffs to have as much information as possible and the risk of compromising the continuing criminal investigation, damaging future international co-operation, and a potential breach of Portuguese law. The parents get information that emanates from them and there is no breach of Portuguese law. 
 
The Chief Constable asks the Court to make clear that previous Orders don't apply. The case is not closed. The Chief Constable wishes to reiterate anyone with information should come forward to the police. The amount of information is 81 pieces of information out of 11,000 pieces of information on the computer system.
 
Representative of the Attorney General: 
 
The Attorney General intervened as Guardian of the public interest and has no further comment to make.
 
IN THE MATTER OF MADELEINE BETH MCCANN
 
Judgement of Mrs Justice Hogg at the High Court, Family Division, RCJ, London, 7 th July 2008, in open court: International Family Law Group
 
Madeleine went missing on 3 May 2007 just a few days before her 4 th birthday, while she was holidaying with her family in the Algarve in Portugal.
 
On 17 May 2007 Madeleine's parents invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under the Inherent Jurisdiction of the Court, and The Child Abduction and Custody Act, and the Hague Convention. They sought various orders and directions aimed at ascertaining the whereabouts and recovery of Madeleine. I became involved with the proceedings shortly afterwards.
 
On 2 April 2008 Madeleine became a Ward of this Court, and since that date has remained a Ward.
 
At all times jurisdiction was assumed by the Court because, there being no evidence to the contrary, it is presumed Madeleine is alive.
 
She is a British Citizen, and like her parents habitually resident here.
 
The current application was made on 2 April 2008 by the parents seeking disclosure of information and documents from the Chief Constable of Leicestershire to assist them and their own investigations in their search for Madeleine. Such are the complexities of the issues involved other interested parties were invited and joined to the application, and directions given for the hearing today.
 
The parties have reached an accommodation whereby the Chief Constable will provide to Madeleine's parents contact details of members of the public who had themselves contacted the parents or their solicitors, and which on receipt were immediately passed to the Chief Constable, together with a brief resume of the information given.
 
The parents do not wish to pursue other aspects of the application, and save for the draft consent order being approved by this Court wish to withdraw their application and seek leave to do so.
 
I have no criticism of the parents in making this application. They have behaved responsibly and reasonably throughout.
 
I have considered the documents provided to this Court by the various parties, and have concluded that the agreement reached by the parties is entirely appropriate, and that the parents should be permitted to withdraw the balance of their application.
 
I will make the Order by Consent as sought. In particular paragraph 1 of the Order made on the 22 May 2007 shall be varied with the words:
 
"The terms of this paragraph shall not apply to the Chief Constable of Leicestershire or any other United Kingdom law enforcement agency. And for the avoidance of doubt all the evidence submitted to the Court and the Case Summaries and Skeleton Arguments remain confidential to the Court save that the Chief Constable may use his discretion to disclose his evidence, case summary and skeleton arguments filed in this Court and the Orders of 22 May 2007, 2 April 2008 and this Order. Any other documents and their contents are not to be disclosed to any person or published save in accordance with Orders already made by the Court or further Order of the Court".
 
It may be noted that neither of the Parents is present today. I let it be known last week that providing their legal team was fully instructed neither parent need be present, and I would not criticise or bear any ill-feeling towards them if they chose to stay away. It was my decision as they have suffered enough, and I wished to ease their burden.
 
I know the police authorities and other official law enforcement agencies in this country, in Portugal and elsewhere have striven and will continue to strive to trace Madeleine.
 
I urge anyone who has any information however small or tenuous to come forward now so that further enquiries can be made.
 
There is, of course, as least one person who knows what has happened to Madeleine, and where she may be found.
 
I ponder about that person: whether that person has a heart and can understand what it must be like for Madeleine to have been torn and secreted from her parents and siblings whom she loves and felt secure with, and whom no doubt misses and grieves for. Whether that person has a conscience or any feeling of guilt, remorse or even cares about the hurt which has been caused to an innocent little girl: whether that person has a faith and belief, and what explanation or justification that person will give to God.
 
I entreat that person whoever and wherever you may be to show mercy and compassion, and come forward now to tell us where Madeleine is to be found.
 
I hope and pray that Madeleine will be found very soon alive and well.
 
I confirm the Wardship and Madeleine will remain a Ward of Court until further Order of the Court. The case will be reserved to myself subject to my availability.

Press Reports

 
First news of the McCanns High Court action and that Madeleine had been made a ward of court, 20 June 2008
 
Madeleine McCann: parents' court bid for information Telegraph
 
By Gordon Rayner, Chief Reporter
Last Updated: 7:26PM BST 20/06/2008
 
Kate and Gerry McCann are to ask a High Court judge to order the release of police documents which they hope will kick-start the search for their missing daughter Madeleine, The Daily Telegraph can disclose.

The McCanns hope their application to Mrs Justice Hogg will result in Leicestershire Police opening their files on scores of reported sightings of Madeleine, most of which have been passed on to them by police in Portugal, where the four-year-old disappeared in May last year.

Until now police in Leicestershire, the McCanns' home county, have refused the couple's requests for information about sightings, saying they are bound by the terms of an agreement with Portuguese police.

But Mr and Mrs McCann, who retain the services of a Spanish-based detective agency, are anxious to make sure that every possible lead has been checked out, which they believe the Portuguese police, whose investigation is gradually being wound down, may not be able to do.
 
The Telegraph can also disclose that Madeleine was made a ward of court last summer at the request of the McCanns, to empower judges to act in her best interests in any legal dispute such as the case which is about to be heard.

Clarence Mitchell, the McCanns’ spokesman, said: "I can state that on the instigation of Gerry and Kate McCann Madeleine is a ward of the High Court of England and Wales.

"An application has been made on Madeleine's behalf by her parents for disclosure of certain documents. The hearing is currently scheduled for July 7 in the High Court in London.

"It has been the stated intention of Gerry and Kate McCann to leave no stone unturned in doing everything necessary to search for their daughter, as would any parent.

"This application is just part of their search for Madeleine."

Madeleine's status as a ward of court has never been disclosed by her parents' who quietly made a wardship application in the High Court just weeks after she went missing.

The couple's legal team had advised them to ask for Madeleine to be made a ward of court because wardship status gives the courts certain statutory powers to act on her behalf in legal disputes such as the one which has arisen with Leicestershire police.

They still believe their daughter is alive and hope the police files may contain information which could yet lead to a breakthrough.

The case is listed to be heard in open court on July 7 in the Family Division of the High Court in London, and is expected to be contested by Leicestershire Police, according to legal sources.

Clarence Mitchell, the McCanns' spokesman, said: "Kate and Gerry have always said that they will do whatever is necessary to find Madeleine and that they will leave no stone unturned in their search for their daughter.

"They will take whatever legal steps are necessary if there is information out there that can assist their private investigation into finding Madeleine. Beyond that I cannot make any comment."

Mr Mitchell said the hearing would not involve any attempt by the McCanns to clear their names by proving they were not involved in their daughter's disappearance from a holiday apartment in Praia da Luz. They remain official suspects, or arguidos, in Portugal.

In recent months the couple have become increasingly frustrated at the slow progress of the Portuguese investigation, and they suspect that many possible sightings of Madeleine have not been followed up at all.

If they are given access to the police files on reported sightings, each one will be looked into by private investigators retained by the couple.

For the past year the McCanns have employed Metodo 3, a Barcelona-based detective agency, to carry out an investigation in parallel with the Portuguese police inquiry.

The agency has checked out sightings as far afield as North Africa and South America – all of which have proved to be false – using either its own staff or affiliated firms, which it says it can do far more quickly than the police.

In one instance earlier this year, the agency ruled out a sighting of Madeleine in Chile within three hours of receiving a tip-off, by employing local investigators to track down the girl concerned. The agency argues that police would have taken days to achieve a similar result because they would have been hampered by bureaucracy and official procedure.

Earlier this week Portugal's Attorney General suggested that police files may be opened up at the end of July, but the McCanns fear his comments may prove to be another false dawn.

Their case is being heard in the Family Division because it involves the welfare of a child. Mrs Justice Hogg, a specialist in child welfare cases, is the sister of former cabinet minister Douglas Hogg and the daughter of former Lord Chancellor Lord Hailsham.

 
Details of High Court hearing released on HMCS website, 04 July 2008
 
McCanns listed to appear in court on Monday HMCS
 
Last updated: 04 Jul 08 (HMCS)
 
Court 20
Before MRS JUSTICE HOGG
Monday, 7 July, 2008
At 10:30 AM
IN OPEN COURT
FD07P01121 McCann
Applications/Summonses in Court as in Chambers
FD06P01276
 
*
 
Related press report:
 
'The case is listed to be heard in open court on July 7 in the Family Division of the High Court in London, and is expected to be contested by Leicestershire Police, according to legal sources.' Telegraph

 
Maddie: Bid to get cop files, 07 July 2008
 
Maddie: Bid to get cop files Daily Star
 
By Jerry Lawton

 
Madeleine McCann parents launch High Court battle for police documents, 07 July 2008
 
Madeleine McCann parents launch High Court battle for police documents Telegraph
 
By Laura Clout